These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: App-based learning as an alternative for instructors in teaching basic life support to school children: a randomized control trial. Author: Doucet L, Lammens R, Hendrickx S, Dewolf P. Journal: Acta Clin Belg; 2019 Oct; 74(5):317-325. PubMed ID: 30105946. Abstract: Background: The importance of early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cannot be emphasized enough and has a major impact on survival. Unfortunately, CPR education in schools is often inadequate or non-existing due to lack of educators and financial resources. The introduction of application-based teaching could facilitate education as no instructor is needed. The aim of present study is to compare app-based self-teaching (intervention group) with a traditional instructor-led course (control group). This trial is in line with the endorsement of training school children by the World Health Organization (WHO). Methods: This randomized controlled trial contains 165 participants between 16 and 18 years. The control group followed an instructor-led course, while the intervention group used a tablet application to complete a self-education course.Both groups were taught in separated classes during 40 min and used manikins and automated external defibrillator (AED) trainer kits. Before and after training, both groups were evaluated in a practical test to examine their skills (an overall score and sub-scores on different sections were obtained, following ERC 2015 guidelines). Results: No significant difference (p = 0.304) in overall teaching effectiveness was found between both groups. Although, in a sub-analysis, we found significantly better results for the instructor group for checking airway (p = 0.018), asking for an AED (p < 0.01) and shocking the patient (p = 0.002). Conclusions: App-based teaching can be a valuable alternative for classic instructor-based education. Yet new apps have to be evaluated before being implemented in CPR education.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]