These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Assessment of Novel Peguero-Lo Presti Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Criteria in a Large Asian Population: Newer May Not Be Better.
    Author: Sun GZ, Wang HY, Ye N, Sun YX.
    Journal: Can J Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1153-1157. PubMed ID: 30170670.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Recently, the novel Peguero-Lo Presti electrocardiographic criteria to diagnose left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were developed from Caucasian American population with a relatively high sensitivity. However, further validation on a large Asian population has never been conducted. Thus, this study was to test and validate the overall performance of this index in a general population from China. METHODS: A total of 10,614 permanent residents ≥35 years of age were included in this study. All participants completed 12-lead electrocardiography and echocardiography at the same visit. A receiver-operating characteristic curve was used for comparing the performance of electrocardiographic indices in diagnosing echocardiographic LVH. RESULTS: The Peguero-Lo Presti criteria had higher sensitivity but lower specificity than Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon voltage according to the recommended criteria. The area under the curve of this novel Peguero-Lo Presti voltage was lower than that of Cornell for predicting LVH defined by both left ventricular mass/body surface area (0.665 vs 0.699 in males; 0.689 vs 0.721 in females) and left ventricular mass/height2.7 (0.623 vs 0.681 in males; 0.642 vs 0.709 in females) (all Ps < 0.05). By changing cutoff values, Cornell voltage outperformed Peguero-Lo Presti whether to achieve a relatively high sensitivity or specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The novel Peguero-Lo Presti voltage may not be a better screening tool for LVH in Asian population. In comparison with this new index, Cornell voltage could be a better screening test for LVH by changing its cutoff values to obtain maximum sensitivity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]