These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative Evaluation of the Prognostic Value Between the Ocular Trauma Score and the Pediatric Penetrating Ocular Trauma Score.
    Author: Morgan AM, Kasahara N.
    Journal: J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 29(7):1776-1779. PubMed ID: 30234717.
    Abstract:
    Controversy exists about the utility of the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) in children. A new score was developed specifically for children-the Pediatric Penetrating Ocular Trauma Score (POTS)-which proved to be of prognostic value in young patients with penetrating eye injuries. The purpose of the study was to compare the prognostic value of OTS and POTS in children with open-globe injuries in a cohort of Brazilian children. This was a retrospective, interventional case series and included 37 children with open-globe injuries seen at the Santa Casa de Sao Paulo Emergency Service. Mean age was 8.0 ± 3.9 years; 28 were male and 9 female. All patients were reviewed on the basis of time and circumstance of injury, time of surgery, type of penetrating injury, initial and final visual acuity (VA), and concomitant eye disease. Both OTS and POTS categories were calculated based on specific variables. The final achieved VA was compared with the predicted VA for both scores with Kendall's test for significant association; the agreement between the predicted VA for both OTS and POTS was accessed with the Cohen kappa coefficient. The association between OTS and achieved VA was good (Kendall Tau-b = 0.511, P = 0.001), as well as between POTS and achieved VA (Kendall Tau-b = 0.422, P = 0.002). The agreement between the predicted VA for OTS and POTS was fair (kappa = 0.400). In conclusion, in this small cohort of Brazilian children with open-globe injuries, there was no superiority of one score over the other and both OTS and POTS underestimated the potential best-corrected VA after treatment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]