These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of Occupational Stress and Its Factors of Workers in An Oil Refinery].
    Author: Ren MX, Tian HE, Ma L, Zhou LP, Wang Y.
    Journal: Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Jun 20; 36(6):422-425. PubMed ID: 30248736.
    Abstract:
    Objective: To explore the differences of occupational stress and its factors between petroleum refining workers and support staffs, and to propose more targeted measures to promote the health of petroleum refining and petrochemical workers. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among 353 petroleum refining workers and 189 employees in the logistics department using the occupational stress inventory revised edition (OSI-R) scale between June 13, 2017 and July 27, 2017. Results: Among the occupational factors, there were significant differences in the job requirements, work risk, job monotony, participation in the decision-making scores among the male workers between labor group and logistics group (P<0.01) . And for female workers in the chemical group and logistics group there were also differences in the value of work control, job requirements, work monotonous, work prospects, improvement of opportunity (P<0.05) . In the aspect of personality traits, the score of work psychological control in chemical group was higher than that of the logistics group, while the organization loyalty score was lower than that of the logistics group. Be-sides, there were significant differences between chemical group and logistics group in the score of A behavior, self-esteem and anxiety traits among female group (P<0.05) . In terms of mitigating factors, there was a significant difference in social support score between chemical group and logistics group among female workers (P<0.01) . Comparison of the two groups of psychological stress showed that the mental health and anxiety status of the chemical group and the logistics group showed a difference (P<0.05) , and female workers in the chemical group job satisfaction score lower than the logistics group, but the body Complaints score higher than the logistics group. Conclusion: The psychological stress response of petroleum refining workers is obviously more serious than the staff of logistics department, and there were significant differences between the two groups on occupational stress factors. 目的： 探讨某石油化工企业炼化工人与后勤部工作人员间职业应激以及其因素间的差异，为促进石油炼化企业职工健康提出更加针对性的措施。 方法： 于2017年6~7月，采用职业紧张（occupational stress inventory revised edition，OSI-R）量表对353名石油化工工人（研究组）及后勤部门员工（对照组）189人进行问卷调查，调查化工工人与后勤工作人员的职业应激差别，分析其应激源。 结果： 在职业因素中，与对照组比较，研究组男性工人的工作需求、工作危险、工作单调性、参与决策评分均有明显差异，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01），与对照组比较，研究组女性工人的工作控制、工作需求、工作单调性、工作前景、提升机会评分有差异，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；在个性特征中，与对照组比较，研究组工作心理控制源评分高，而组织忠诚度评分低，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；研究组女性工人A型行为、自尊感、焦虑特质评分间有差异，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；缓解因素中，与对照组比较，研究组女性工人的社会支持评分间存在明显差异，差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。比较两组心理性紧张反应表明，研究组和对照组在心理健康和焦虑状态两项评分上有差异，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），并且研究组女性工人工作满意感评分低于对照组，而躯体抱怨评分高于对照组差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论： 石油炼化工人的心理性紧张反应较后勤部门工作人员更为强烈，职业应激因素之间有明显不同。.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]