These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Post/preprocedural ratio of hemodynamically assessed aortic regurgitation index as a marker for the need for corrective measures during transcatheter valve replacement: A first confirmatory study in patients receiving a new generation transcatheter self-expandable prosthesis.
    Author: Mas-Peiro S, Weiler H, Papadopoulos N, Zeiher AM, Fichtlscherer S, Vasa-Nicotera M.
    Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb 15; 93(3):532-537. PubMed ID: 30269429.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the value of post/preprocedural aortic regurgitation index (ARI) ratio as a marker for more-than-mild aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and as an indication of the need for corrective measures, provided that the implantation depth was acceptable. BACKGROUND: Post/preprocedural ARI increases accuracy of residual AR assessment by considering hemodynamic status prior to TAVR. METHODS: ARI ratio was calculated in 70 patients undergoing TAVR. ARI ratios were defined as post/preprocedural ARI (ARI ratio 1), and as postcorrective measure/preprocedural ARI (ARI ratio 2). Intraprocedurally, corrective measures use was decided based on angiographically assessed AR severity. The relationship of such decisions to ARI ratios based on a recently proposed threshold (ARI ratio < 0.6) was evaluated. ARI ratios in corrected versus noncorrected patients and precorrection versus postcorrection values were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, mean (±SD) ARI ratio 1 (n = 70) was 0.81 (±0.36). Corrective measures were used in 22 patients (31.4%). Mean ARI ratio 1 in such patients was 0.55 (±0.25) versus 0.93 (±0.34) in the 48 noncorrected patients (P < 0.0001). Mean ARI ratio 1 in 21 patients requiring postdilation was 0.56 (±0.25), which was below the previously suggested 0.6 threshold. After postdilation, ARI ratio 2 increased to 0.85 (±0.16) (P < 0.0001), with all patients showing an ARI ratio 2 ≥ 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: ARI ratio is closely related to intraprocedural decisions to perform corrective measures based on angiography. Routine use of intraprocedural ARI ratio could be useful as a complementary quantitative marker for residual AR and for the need for corrective measures.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]