These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Unsupervised cluster analysis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp using routinely available clinical markers and its implication in treatment outcomes.
    Author: Kim JW, Huh G, Rhee CS, Lee CH, Lee J, Chung JH, Cho SW.
    Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 30281956.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multidimensional disease. In this study, we performed an unsupervised cluster analysis of CRSwNP using routinely available clinical markers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with endoscopic sinus surgery due to medically intractable bilateral CRSwNP from 2009 to 2017. Unsupervised cluster analysis was performed using a patient's clinical features, including age, peripheral blood eosinophil, tissue eosinophilia, Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) scores, ratio of the CT scores for the ethmoid sinus and maxillary sinus (E/M ratio), and comorbid asthma. Tree analysis was performed to develop a clustering algorithm. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine the revision surgery-free probability corresponding to each cluster. RESULTS: Data were available on 375 patients. Patients were categorized into 6 clusters comprising 2 asthmatic clusters and 4 non-asthmatic clusters. The labels for the 2 asthmatic clusters were: asthmatic non-eosinophilic polyp (cluster A1) and asthmatic eosinophilic polyp (cluster A2). The labels for the 4 non-asthmatic clusters were: non-eosinophilic polyp with older age (cluster NA1); non-eosinophilic pol'yp with younger age (cluster NA2); eosinophilic polyp with lower E/M ratio (cluster NA3); and eosinophilic polyp with higher E/M ratio (cluster NA4). The 4-year revision-free rates were 100% (cluster NA1), 80.3% (NA2), 98.0% (NA3), 66.7% (NA4), 100% (A1), and 66.7% (A2). The clusters showed statistically significant differences in terms of 4-year revision-free rates (log-rank p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Cluster analysis identified 2 asthmatic clusters and 4 non-asthmatic clusters in CRSwNP. Each cluster corresponded to a different clinical outcome.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]