These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Supraspinal and spinal potency of selective opioid agonists in the mouse writhing test.
    Author: Porreca F, Mosberg HI, Omnaas JR, Burks TF, Cowan A.
    Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1987 Mar; 240(3):890-4. PubMed ID: 3031278.
    Abstract:
    Three agonists with the highest degree of selectivity available for mu ([D-Ala2,NMePhe4,Gly-ol]enkephalin, DAGO), delta ([ D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin, DPDPE) and kappa (U-50,488H, U50) opioid receptors were compared for their activity in inhibiting acetic acid-induced writhing in mice. Additionally, three reference agonists for mu (morphine), delta ([ D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin, DADLE) and kappa (ketocyclazocine, KC) receptors were also studied in this test. The agonists were given directly into the lateral cerebral ventricle (i.c.v.) or into the lumbar spinal subarachnoid space (intrathecal), and the potency of each compound was compared across injection sites and with data previously obtained in a thermal analgesic test (mouse hot-plate test). The rank order of potency for inhibition of writhing after i.c.v. administration was DAGO greater than DADLE greater than morphine greater than DPDPE; KC and U50 showed no significant activity by this route. After intrathecal administration, the compounds inhibited writhing with a rank potency order of DAGO greater than KC greater than morphine = DADLE greater than DPDPE greater than U50. All compounds were more potent in inhibiting writhing at spinal sites than at supraspinal sites; DPDPE and DAGO were 15 and 24 times more potent after intrathecal than after i.c.v. administration, respectively. The proposed delta agonists DPDPE and DADLE inhibited writhing at both spinal and supraspinal sites. Further, although the proposed kappa-acting compounds KC and U50 were effective at relatively low doses at spinal levels, these compounds lacked activity at supraspinal sites at doses not causing sedation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]