These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Simplified quantification of 13N-ammonia PET myocardial blood flow: A comparative study with the standard compartment model to facilitate clinical use.
    Author: Chang CY, Hung GU, Hsu B, Yang BH, Chang CW, Hu LH, Huang WS, Wang HE, Wu TC, Liu RS.
    Journal: J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):819-828. PubMed ID: 30324328.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Short imaging protocol to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) may enhance the clinical application of 13N-ammonia cardiac PET. We assessed the flow quantitation of 13N-ammonia PET implementing simple retention model and two-compartment model. METHODS: Fourteen healthy volunteers (HVT) and twenty-three clinical patients received 13N-ammonia PET/CT. The simple retention model used the first 7-minute image to quantify MBF. Global and regional MBF and MFR of the two models were compared. RESULTS: Global and regional MBF and MFR of these two models were highly correlated with mildly inferior correlation in RCA territory (global R2: rest MBF = 0.79, stress MBF = 0.65, MFR = 0.77; regional R2: rest MBF ≥ 0.72, stress MBF ≥ 0.52, MFR ≥ 0.68). There were significant differences for MFR (4.04 ± 0.72, 3.66 ± 0.48, p = .02) and rest MBF (0.69 ± 0.12, 0.78 ± 0.12, p = .02) between the two models in the HVT group. CONCLUSIONS: 13N-ammonia global and regional MBF and MFR from the simple retention model demonstrate strong correlations with that from the two-compartment model. Significant differences of MFR and rest MBF are noted in the HVT group, with a proposed normal reference value for the 13N-ammonia short simple retention protocol.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]