These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Significant Induction of Soluble TNFR2 Compared with TNFR1 in Serum Samples of HIV Patients with or without Antiretroviral Medication.
    Author: Sarfo B, Haile ZT, Deletsu S, Mensah EA, Bonney EY.
    Journal: Infect Disord Drug Targets; 2020; 20(2):175-181. PubMed ID: 30324895.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor and its receptors (sTNFR1 and sTNFR2) have been implicated in many infectious diseases. Identification of the key receptor (sTNFR1 or sTNFR2) which drives the immunopathogenesis of HIV infection is crucial in developing adjunctive therapy for HIV. OBJECTIVE: This study determined the expression levels of sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 in antiretroviral therapy (ART) - experienced and naïve HIV patients. METHODS: A total of 40 HIV patients comprising 30 with ART and 10 without ART were enrolled from the Pantang Hospital located in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana for data and blood collection. Serum concentrations of sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 were determined by ELISA. Mann- Whitney U test was used to examine differences in serum levels of sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 between patients on ART and ART naïve patients. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was performed to determine the difference between sTNFR1 and sTNFR2, and Kruskal Wallis test was conducted to compare the effect of different antiretroviral drugs on the levels of sTNFR1 and sTNFR2. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test indicated serum levels of sTNFR2 was statistically significantly higher than sTNFR1 (Z=-5.51; p<0.001). Levels of sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 did not differ by ART status U =91.00 (Z = -1.84), p = 0.065 and U = 131.50 (Z = -0.58, p =0.560), respectively. There were not significant differences in levels of TNFR2 H(2) = 1.86, p=0.395 and sTNFR1 (H (2) = 4.37, p=0.113 across different ART combinations. CONCLUSION: Compared to sTNFR1, the level of sTNFR2 is significantly increased during HIV infection irrespective of ART status. The high sTNFR2 level is not associated with antiretroviral drugs and may be another potential target for therapeutic development. This is the first study of sTNFRs in African population.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]