These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Frame-based stereotactic biopsies using an intraoperative MR-scanner are as safe and effective as conventional stereotactic procedures. Author: Neumann JO, Campos B, Younes B, Jakobs M, Jungk C, Beynon C, Deimling AV, Unterberg A, Kiening K. Journal: PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205772. PubMed ID: 30352066. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Frame-based stereotactic biopsy (FBSB) is a minimally-invasive and effective procedure for the diagnosis of brain lesions and will likely gain clinical importance. Since FBSB procedures comprise a variety of imaging and sampling methods, it is necessary to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual techniques. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of FBSB using 1.5T iMRI as a one-stop procedure under general anesthesia without intraoperative histological examination. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective analysis, 500 consecutive FBSBs using iMRI were compared to a historic control of 100 biopsies with traditional workflows (computed tomography (CT) with MRI image fusion). All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Data on surgical procedures, pre- and postoperative neurologic patient status, complications and diagnostic yield were extracted from clinical records. RESULTS: Complication rates and diagnostic yield showed no significant differences between both groups. Mortality was 0.6%, 95% CI = [0.12%, 1.74%], in the iMRI and 0.0% [0.00%, 3.62%], in the control group with a morbidity of 5.4% [3.6%, 7.8%] and 6.0% [2.2%, 12.6%] and a diagnostic yield of 96.8% [94.9%, 98.2%] and 96.0% [90.1%, 98.9%]. Mean procedure duration was 124 [121, 127] minutes using iMRI and 112 [106, 118] minutes in the control group. CONCLUSION: FBSB using 1.5T iMRI under general anesthesia is a safe and effective procedure and is equivalent to traditional stereotactic workflows with respect to complication rate and diagnostic yield.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]