These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Individualized evaluation of lumbar bone mineral density and bone mineral apparent density in children and adolescents. Author: Duran I, Martakis K, Rehberg M, Semler O, Schoenau E. Journal: Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Oct 29; 13(1):117. PubMed ID: 30374788. Abstract: UNLABELLED: Lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS-BMD) assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used in children to evaluate bone health. LS-BMD results in children are influenced significantly by height and BMI. An adjustment for these parameters may improve the clinical use of the method. PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION: DXA evaluation is considered useful in children to assess bone health. For this purpose, lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS-BMD) and bone mineral apparent density (LS-BMAD) are often used. The aim of the study was to estimate the effect of height and BMI on LS-BMD and LS-BMAD in children and adolescents and to develop a method to adjust individual results for these factors. METHODS: As part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) study, between the years 2005 and 2010 lumbar DXA scans on randomly selected Americans from 8 to 20 years of age were carried out. From all eligible DXA scans, three major US ethnic groups were evaluated (Non-Hispanic Whites, Non-Hispanic Blacks, and Mexican Americans) for further statistical analysis. The relationship between height as well as BMI for age Z-scores and age-adjusted LS-BMD and LS-BMAD Z-scores was analyzed. RESULTS: For the statistical analysis, the DXA scans of 1799 non-Hispanic White children (823 females), of 1696 non-Hispanic Black children (817 females), and of 1839 Mexican American children (884 females) were eligible. The statistical analysis showed that taller and heavier children had significantly (p < 0.001) higher age-adjusted LS-BMD Z-scores than shorter and lighter children. But on LS-BMAD, only BMI and not height had a significant influence. CONCLUSIONS: LS-BMD results in children were influenced significantly by their height and BMI, the LS-BMAD results were only influenced by their BMI. For the first time, the proposed method adjusts LS-BMD and LS-BMAD to BMI. An adjustment of the LS-BMD and LS-BMAD results to these factors might improve the clinical significance of an individual result.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]