These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Nuclear spin tomography and computerized tomography in malignant hypernephroma].
    Author: Uhlenbrock D, Fischer C, Rühl G, Beyer HK, Hummelsheim P.
    Journal: Rofo; 1987 Jun; 146(6):664-74. PubMed ID: 3037637.
    Abstract:
    Forty patients with histologically confirmed hypernephromas were examined by MR and CT. As regards T-staging, MR had an accuracy of 97% and CT of 91%; for N-staging, MR had an accuracy of 85% and CT of 91% and, with regard to infiltration of the renal vein, MR was correct in 88% of cases and CT in 81%. MR was most accurate in the pre-operative assessment of tumour spread, demonstrating caval involvement in 100% and lymph node metastases in 97%. On the other hand, infiltration of the renal pelvis could be assessed in only 65% of cases; in 27% the assessment was not possible and in 8% one could not be certain. CT proved to be at its best for staging of lymph nodes, but in 15% it was not possible to identify infiltration of the renal vein. MR was not greatly superior to CT in the preoperative diagnosis and staging of hypernephromas.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]