These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Treatment of the Prominent Ear: A Standardized Approach Without Intraoperative Measurements.
    Author: MacIsaac ZM, Zammerilla L, Grunwaldt LJ.
    Journal: J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):228-230. PubMed ID: 30376502.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Candidates for otoplasty have variable anatomy that may result in an aesthetically suboptimal appearance. The authors describe an algorithm to obtain ideal aesthetic position of the ear using a standardized suturing only technique. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted at a major children's hospital. Pre- and postoperative distances from the mastoid to the posterior lateral helical rim were measured at 3 consistent points (upper helix, mid helix, and lobule). Cosmetic outcomes were determined by visual analog cosmetic score (VACS), assigned by 3 independent reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients underwent otoplasty for prominent ear (average age 8.2 years). Duration of follow-up was an average of 32 weeks postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative VACSs were determined for all patients: overall-appearance, 25.8 versus 71.3; overall-ear appearance, 25.7 versus 70.0; shape, 24.4 versus 72.6; and projection, 23.7 versus 73.9 (P < 0.05 for all). There was no inter-rater difference between scores. There was greater symmetry between ears postoperatively (P < 0.05). Measurements were significantly improved pre- versus postoperatively: upper-helix 2.04 versus 1.20 cm, mid-helix 2.22 versus 1.18 cm, and lobule 1.85 versus 1.49 cm (P < 0.05.) Postoperative measurements are in accordance with established norms for ideal ear position (1.0-1.2 cm upper third of the ear). Two patients recurred, and 1 experienced a spitting suture (11.5%). CONCLUSION: Aesthetic ideal was established on the operating table based on the appearance of the ear. Postoperative measurements fell within aesthetic ideal for a normal ear, suggesting that the use of intraoperative measurements are not needed to obtain an aesthetically acceptable outcome.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]