These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.
    Author: Ando T, Adegbala O, Villablanca PA, Briasoulis A, Takagi H, Grines CL, Schreiber T, Nazif T, Kodali S, Afonso L.
    Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr 01; 93(5):954-962. PubMed ID: 30408309.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To assess the in-hospital outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in non-teaching hospitals. BACKGROUND: TAVR has become widely available in the United States. However, the comparative outcomes of TAVR vs. SAVR in non-teaching hospitals are largely under explored. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2011 to September 2015 to identify those who were 50 years or above and underwent either trans-arterial TAVR or SAVR at non-teaching hospital. In-hospital clinical outcomes were compared with odds ratio (OR) in propensity-matched cohorts. RESULTS: We identified un-weighted 957 and 7,465 SAVR admissions. In propensity-matched model, 596 admissions in each arm were included for final analysis. In-patient mortality (3.9 vs. 2.5%, OR 1.54, P = 0.34), acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (2.2 vs. 2.7%, OR 0.80, P = 0.57), stroke (2.0 vs. 3.2%, OR 0.61, P = 0.20), and pacemaker placement (8.9 vs. 6.4%, OR 1.47, P = 0.09) was similar between TAVR and SAVR. Sub-group analysis showed that female and those with prior coronary artery bypass surgery had higher risk of in-patient morality in TAVR admission. Cost was higher (59,103 vs. 53,411 dollars, P = 0.006) but length of stay was shorter in TAVR (6.9 vs. 10.2 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TAVR conferred similar in-hospital mortality and major peri-procedural complications compared with SAVR in non-teaching hospitals. For those with limited access to teaching hospitals, non-teaching hospitals appear to be a reasonable option for candidates of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]