These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Aortic dilatation in patients with large vessel vasculitis: A longitudinal case control study using PET/CT.
    Author: Muratore F, Crescentini F, Spaggiari L, Pazzola G, Casali M, Boiardi L, Pipitone N, Croci S, Galli E, Aldigeri R, Versari A, Salvarani C.
    Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum; 2019 Jun; 48(6):1074-1082. PubMed ID: 30424972.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate aortic diameter and predictors of aortic dilatation using 18FDG-PET/CT in a longitudinally followed cohort of patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) compared with controls. METHODS: All consecutive patients with LVV who underwent at least 2 PET/CT scans between January 2008 and May 2015 were included. The first and last PET/CT study was evaluated by a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician. Diameter and FDG uptake of the aorta was measured at 4 different levels: ascending, descending thoracic, suprarenal and infrarenal abdominal aorta. Twenty-nine age- and sex-matched patients with lymphoma who underwent at least 2 PET/CT scans in the same time interval were selected as controls. RESULTS: 93 patients with LVV were included in the study. In the time interval between first and last PET/CT study (median time 31 months), the diameter of the ascending, descending thoracic and suprarenal abdominal aorta significantly increased in LVV patients but not in controls. At last PET/CT, patients with LVV compared with controls had higher diameter of ascending [35.41 (5.54) vs 32.97 (4.11) mm, p = 0.029], descending thoracic [28.42 (4.82) vs 25.72 (3.55) mm, p = 0.007] and suprarenal abdominal aorta, mean [25.34 (7.01) vs 22.16 (3.26) mm, p = 0.005] and more frequently had aortic dilatation [19% vs 3%, p = 0.023]. Significant predictors of aortic dilatation were male sex [OR 7.27, p = 0.001] and, only for GCA, hypertension [OR 6.30, p = 0.031]. Finally, GCA patients with aortic FDG uptake grade 3 at first PET/CT, compared to those with aortic FDG uptake ≤2, had significantly higher aortic diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LVV are at increased risk of aortic dilatation compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Significant predictors of aortic dilatation are male sex and, only for GCA, hypertension. GCA patients with aortic FDG uptake grade 3 are at increased risk of aortic dilatation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]