These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Image Quality Performance of Virtual Single-Source CT Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography.
    Author: Alikhani B, Werner M, Jamali L, Wacker F, Werncke T.
    Journal: Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1095-1101. PubMed ID: 30482627.
    Abstract:
    RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to analyze the image quality provided by a dual-source (DS) data set and a single-source (SS) data set at the same radiation exposure, in order to evaluate a dose splitting method for dual-source scanning protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 192-slice dual-source third generation CT (Somatom Force; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) was used to image a Catphan phantom (Catphan503; The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, New York) utilizing different X-ray tube voltages from 70 to 120 kVp with an organ-based tube-current modulation technique (X-CARE; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). In order to keep the radiation dose (given by volume computed tomography dose index) in a clinically relevant range, different X-ray tube time-current products ranging from 80 to 300 mAs were selected. The data sets by each X-ray tube voltage were collected using a single-source as well as a dual-source mode. The measurements in the dual-source mode were performed with five different tube currents of the X-ray tube A and B. Thereby, the tube current ratios were 50%|50% (DS 0.5), 60%|40% (DS 0.6), 70%|30% (DS 0.7), 80%|20% (DS 0.8), and 90%|10% (DS 0.9). The images were reconstructed by the use of a filter-back projection (Br40) and an advanced mode led iterative reconstruction algorithms (advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithms [ADMIRE]; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) with a strength range of 1-5. The image quality was evaluated in terms of noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), low-contrast detectability expressed as the structural similarity index (SSIM) and spatial resolution quantified by the full width at half maximum of the line-spread function. RESULTS: Image noise decreased by the use of the dual-source mode, which led to improvement of their CNR compared to the single-source mode. SSIM showed an almost constant behavior by both modes. The spatial resolution indicated a lower trend by the dual-source mode in comparison to the single-source mode. However, the loss of the spatial resolution performance was lower than 5% for the dual-source modes. CONCLUSION: The presented phantom study demonstrated that SSIM and spatial resolution performance obtained by dual-source CT protocols showed a negligible variation to those by the single-source CT. However, the noise and CNR displayed an improvement for the dual-source CT. Therefore, the use of the dual-source CT enables to split the radiation dose between X-ray tubes and to compare the data sets with different radiation dose levels without loss in the image quality.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]