These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Presence of hepatitis B virus markers in umbilical cord blood: Exposure to or infection with the virus?
    Author: Liu J, Xu B, Chen T, Chen J, Feng J, Xu C, Liu L, Hu Y, Zhou YH.
    Journal: Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Jun; 51(6):864-869. PubMed ID: 30528568.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to clarify whether presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers in cord blood indicates exposure to or infection with HBV. METHODS: We prospectively recruited HBsAg-positive pregnant women and their neonates 2012 through 2015. All neonates received postnatal immunoprophylaxis. The infants were followed up at 7-14 months of age. RESULTS: Totally 329 HBsAg-positive pregnant women and 333 neonates were enrolled. No cord blood was anti-HBc IgM positive. A total of 290 (87.1%) neonates were followed up at 7-14 months of age and 6 (2.1%) of them were infected with HBV. Of 146 neonates born to HBeAg-negative mothers, 38 (26.0%) and 30 (20.5%) had detectable HBsAg and HBV DNA in cord blood respectively, but none of 126 infants followed up was infected. Of 187 neonates born to HBeAg-positive mothers, 92 (49.2%) and 79 (42.2%) had detectable HBsAg and HBV DNA in cord blood respectively; 6 (3.7%) of 164 infants followed up were infected. Of seven neonates with HBV DNA > 105 IU/ml in cord blood, four had no infection and three others were infected. CONCLUSION: Presence of HBsAg and/or HBV DNA, even at high levels, in cord blood just indicates exposure to, but not infection with HBV. Presence of HBV markers in cord blood cannot define intrauterine infection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]