These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Clinical trial of BOBCAT: 1st report on the reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry].
    Author: Picard M, Ilecki HJ, Baxter JD.
    Journal: Audiology; 1988; 27(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 3056359.
    Abstract:
    Computerized diagnostic audiometry is quickly emerging as a viable productivity tool in the audiology clinic. To date, there has been little reported on its reliability and validity with the hearing-impaired. The 'Battery of Basic Computerized Audiometric Tests' (BOBCAT) is a computer program which puts a wide variety of clinical hearing tests under computer control. The purpose of the present study was to ascertain the reliability and validity of BOBCAT in the measurement of hearing sensitivity. A field study was conducted in a group of 92 workers exposed to noise to measure air- and bone-conduction thresholds. Coefficients of reliability of 0.85 and higher were obtained between air and bone thresholds for both methods of testing; that is, manual and computer-controlled audiometry. The same measurement between manual and computerized air-conduction pure-tone thresholds gave values ranging from 0.93 to 0.98. A principal-components analysis documented content validity of computerized audiometry. These results are interpreted as clear evidence of both reliability and validity of the BOBCAT procedure, with one exception: 6.7% of all observations are showing air-conduction computerized thresholds of -10 dB at one or more frequencies, with no confirmation by manual audiometry. This is attributed to insufficient randomization of intervals between stimuli, a problem which should be taken care of by new versions of the software.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]