These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [A CASE OF LYMPH NODE TUBERCULOSIS ASSOCIATED WITH A FLUID-FILLED MASS IN THE THORACIC WALL DUE TO A PARADOXICAL RESPONSE TO THERAPY]. Author: Araki Y, Harata A, Maeda H. Journal: Kekkaku; 2016 Sep; 91(6):545-549. PubMed ID: 30646456. Abstract: A 72-year-old man was admitted to our hospital in November 201X- 1 because of fever and left cervical lymph node swelling. Chest computed tomography (CT) confirmed left swelling in the cervical lymph node and the axillary lymph node. We performed a lymph node biopsy and diagnosed tuberculosis of the lymph nodes (the left cervical region and the axilla). The patient was treated with anti-tuberculosis drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide) in December 14, 201X-1. After initiating the therapy, the fever resolved, and his general conditions gradually improved. Thus, the patient recovered well because of the anti-tubercu- losis therapy. Despite maintaining good general conditions, the patient experienced increasing swelling in his left hemi- thorax around the end of January 201X. A chest CT showed a clear fluid-filled mass in the left thoracic wall. Microscopic examination of the specimen obtained by CT-guided needle biopsy showed positive results for acid-fast bacteria and polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis indicated that the anti-tuberculosis therapy had failed. How- ever, the patient's general conditions remained good, and the results of blood laboratory tests were stable. Thus, we concluded that the mass was the result of a paradoxical response to the anti-tuberculosis therapy, and we reinstated the same therapy. Although the fluid-filled mass recurred in the same region less than a month following the first anti-tuberculosis therapy, the mass spontaneously regressed when the therapy was reinstated. Thus, we confirmed that a paradoxical response was the cause of the clinical course in this patient.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]