These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Application of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V With Combination of 80 kV for Reducing Radiation Dose and Improving Image Quality in Renal Computed Tomography Angiography for Slim Patients.
    Author: Ren Z, Zhang X, Hu Z, Li D, Liu Z, Wei D, Jia Y, Yu N, Yu Y, Lei Y, Chen X, Guo C, Ren Z, He T.
    Journal: Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):e324-e332. PubMed ID: 30655053.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To explore the application of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) with combination of 80 kV for reducing radiation dose and improving image quality in renal computed tomography angiography (CTA) for slim patients compared with traditional filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction using 120 kV. METHODS: Eighty patients for renal CTA were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into group A and group B. Group A used 120 kV and 600 mgI/kg contrast agent and FBP reconstruction, while group B used 80 kV and 350 mgI/kg contrast agent and both FBP and ASIR-V reconstruction from 10%ASIR-V to 100%ASIR-V with 10%ASIR-V interval. The CT values and SD values of the right renal artery and left renal artery were measured to calculate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The image quality was subjectively scored by two experienced radiologists blindly using a five-point criterion. The contrast agent, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product in both groups were recorded and the effective radiation dose was calculated. RESULTS: There were no significant difference in patient characteristics between two groups (p > 0.05). The CTDIvol, dose length product and effective radiation dose in group B were 59.0%, 65.0%, and 65.1% lower than those in group A, respectively (all p < 0.05), and the contrast agent in group B was 42.2% lower than that in group A (p < 0.05). In group B, with the increase of ASIR-V percentage, CT values showed no significant difference, SD values decreased gradually, SNR values and CNR values increased gradually. The CT values showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between two groups with different reconstructions. The SD values with 40%ASIR-V to 100%ASIR-V reconstruction in group B was significantly lower(p < 0.5), while the SNR values with 50% ASIR-V to 100% ASIR-V reconstruction and CNR values with 70%ASIR-V to 100%ASIR-V were significantly higher than those of group A with FBP reconstruction (p < 0.5). Two radiologists had excellent consistency in subjective scores of image quality for renal CTA (kappa >0.75, p < 0.05). The subjective scores with 60% ASIR-V to 90% ASIR-V in group B were significantly higher than those of FBP in group A (p < 0.5), of which 70%ASIR-V reconstruction obtained the highest subjective score for renal CTA. CONCLUSION: ASIR-V with combination of 80 kV can significantly reduce effective radiation dose (about 65.1%) and contrast agent (about 42.2%) and improve image quality in renal CTA for slim patients compared with traditional FBP reconstruction using 120 kV, and the 70% ASIR-V was the best reconstruction algorithm in 80 kV renal CTA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Using 80 kV with combination of ASIR-V can significantly reduce radiation dose and contrast agent dose as well as improve image quality in renal CTA for thin patients when compared with FBP using 120 kV.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]