These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The Application of a New Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Upper Abdominal CT.
    Author: Jia Y, Zhai B, He T, Yu Y, Yu N, Duan H, Yang C, Zhang X.
    Journal: Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):e275-e283. PubMed ID: 30660470.
    Abstract:
    RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare upper abdominal computed tomography (CT) image quality of new model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) with low-contrast resolution preference (MBIRNR40), conventional MBIR (MBIRc), and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) at low dose with ASIR at routine-dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study included phantom and 60 patients who had initial and follow-up CT scans. For patients, the delay phase was acquired at routine-dose (noise index = 10 HU) for the initial scan and low dose (noise index = 20 HU) for the follow-up. The low-dose CT was reconstructed with 40% and 60% ASIR, MBIRc, and MBIRNR40, while routine-dose CT was reconstructed with 40% ASIR. CT value and noise measurements of the subcutaneous fat, back muscle, liver, and spleen parenchyma were compared using one-way ANOVA. Two radiologists used semiquantitative 7-scale (-3 to +3) to rate image quality and artifacts. RESULTS: The phantom study revealed superior low-contrast resolution with MBIRNR40. For patient scans, the CT dose index for the low-dose CT was 3.00 ± 1.32 mGy, 75% lower than the 11.90 ± 4.75 mGy for the routine-dose CT. Image noise for the low-dose MBIRNR40 images was significantly lower than the low-dose MBIRc and ASIR images, and routine-dose ASIR images (p < 0.05). Subjective ratings showed higher image quality for low-dose MBIRNR40, with lower noise, better low-contrast resolution for abdominal structures, and finer lesion contours than those of low-dose MBIRc and ASIR images, and routine-dose ASIR images (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MBIRNR40 with low-contrast resolution preference provides significantly lower noise and better image quality than MBIRc and ASIR in low-dose abdominal CT; significantly better objective and subjective image quality than the routine-dose ASIR with 75% dose reduction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]