These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT combined with quantification of clonal circulating plasma cells as a potential risk model in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Author: Abe Y, Narita K, Kobayashi H, Kitadate A, Miura D, Takeuchi M, O'uchi E, O'uchi T, Matsue K. Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jun; 46(6):1325-1333. PubMed ID: 30687892. Abstract: PURPOSE: Both 18F-FDG PET/CT and clonal circulating plasma cell (CPC) quantification are emerging tools for multiple myeloma (MM) prognostication that have been validated in recent studies. This study investigated the value of PET/CT coupled with CPC quantification for MM prognostication that may contribute to future risk-adapted treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the prognostic relevance of a combination of pretreatment PET/CT findings and CPC levels in 163 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, symptomatic MM receiving novel agents during induction therapies. RESULTS: High-risk PET/CT findings and elevated CPC levels were defined by the presence of >3 focal lesions with or without extramedullary disease and CPCs ≥0.10% of the total mononuclear cells evaluated, respectively. Subsequently, patients were divided into three groups: PET-CPC stage I included patients with no high-risk PET/CT findings and low CPC levels; stage III included patients with high-risk PET/CT findings and high CPC levels; and stage II included the remaining patients. The three groups of patients differed significantly in terms of both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (median PFS: not reached [NR] and 36.4 and 15.9 months, and median OS: NR, NR, and 40.4 months for stages I, II, and III, respectively; P < 0.001 for both PFS and OS). This system discriminated both PFS and OS even among younger (age < 75 years) or older (≥ 75 years) patients, patients with Revised International Staging System stage II or III, and patients with or without high-risk cytogenetic characteristics. In the multivariate analysis, the PET-CPC staging system remained prognostic for both PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: The PET-CPC staging system predicted survival outcomes independently of established risk factors in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment combined with CPC quantification may improve the prognostication of MM and facilitate the development of novel risk-adapted approaches for MM.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]