These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The King-Devick test in an outpatient concussion clinic: Assessing the diagnostic and prognostic value of a vision test in conjunction with exercise testing among acutely concussed adolescents.
    Author: Lawrence JB, Haider MN, Leddy JJ, Hinds A, Miecznikowski JC, Willer BS.
    Journal: J Neurol Sci; 2019 Mar 15; 398():91-97. PubMed ID: 30690413.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of the King-Devick (K-D) test in conjunction with treadmill testing in adolescents after sport-related concussion (SRC) in an outpatient concussion management clinic without baseline measures. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: The K-D test was administered pre- and post-exercise on a graded treadmill test to acutely concussed (AC, <10 days from injury, n = 46, 15.4 ± 2.1 years) participants for 2 clinic visits (1 week apart) and to matched controls (MC, n = 30, 15.8 ± 1.4 years) for 2 visits (1 week apart). Initial K-D test times were compared between MC and AC. Changes in times from pre- to post- exercise during a treadmill test were compared for MC and AC and from Visit 1 to Visit 2. Smooth pursuits and repetitive saccades were compared with initial visit K-D test performance. RESULTS: Comparison of pre-exercise K-D test times at Visit 1 distinguished MC from AC (46.1 ± 9.2 s vs. 53.7 ± 13.0 s, p = .007). Comparison of pre- and post-exercise K-D test times revealed significant improvements for MC (46.1 ± 9.2 s vs. 43.1 ± 8.5 s, p < .001) and AC who recovered by Visit 2 (Fast Recovery Group [FRG], n = 23, 50.4 ± 10.0 s vs. 47.3 ± 9.8 s, p = .002). No significant difference was seen in pre- and post-exercise K-D test times on Visit 1 for AC who took longer than 2 weeks to recover (Slow Recovery Group [SRG], n = 23, 57.0 ± 15.0 s vs. 56.0 ± 16.3 s, p = .478). At Visit 1, AC had more abnormal smooth pursuits than MC (17% vs. 3%, non-significant, p = .064). AC, however, had significantly more abnormal repetitive saccades than MC (37% vs. 3%, p = .001) and AC with abnormal repetitive saccades took significantly longer to complete the Visit 1 pre-exercise K-D test than AC with normal repetitive saccades (58.6 ± 16.0 s vs 50.8 ± 10.2 s, p = .049). CONCLUSION: The study supports utility of the K-D test as part of outpatient concussion assessment. Lack of improvement in K-D test performance after an exercise test may be an indicator of delayed recovery from SRC.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]