These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of thoracic impedance trends for implant-based remote monitoring in heart failure patients - Results from the (J-)HomeCARE-II Study.
    Author: Maier SKG, Paule S, Jung W, Koller M, Ventura R, Quesada A, Bordachar P, García-Fernández FJ, Schumacher B, Lobitz N, Takizawa K, Ando K, Adachi K, Shoda M.
    Journal: J Electrocardiol; 2019; 53():100-108. PubMed ID: 30739055.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: Remote monitoring by implantable devices substantially improves management of heart failure (HF) patients by providing diagnostic day-to-day data. The use of thoracic impedance (TI) as a surrogate measure of fluid accumulation is still strongly debated. The multicenter HomeCARE-II study evaluated clinically apparent HF events in the context of remote device diagnostics, focusing on the controversial role of TI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We followed 497 patients (66.6 ± 10.1 years, 77% male, QRS 139.8 ± 36.0 ms, ejection fraction 26.8 ± 7.0%) implanted with a CRT-D (67%) or an ICD (33%) for 21.4 ± 8.1 months. An independent event committee confirmed 171 HF events of which 82 were used to develop a TI-based algorithm for the prediction of imminent cardiac decompensation. Highly inter-individual variations in patterns of TI trends were observed. The algorithm resulted in a sensitivity of 41.5% (50.0%) with 0.95 (1.34) false alerts per patient year, and a positive predictive value of 7.9% overall and 27.9% in the HF event group of patients. Averaged ratio statistics showed a significant pre-hospital decrease and a highly significant in-hospital increase in TI after intensified diuresis. Recurrent decompensations turned out to be preceded by a significantly stronger decrease of TI compared to first events with a higher chance for detection (63.6% sensitivity, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall performance in predicting imminent decompensation by monitoring TI alone is limited due to its high inter-patient variability. TI stand-alone applications should be redirected towards a target population with more advanced symptoms where post-hospital observation aimed to maintain the patient's discharge status might be the most valuable approach. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00711360 (HomeCARE-II) and NCT01221649 (J-HomeCARE-II).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]