These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of tube potential and luminal contrast attenuation on atherosclerotic plaque attenuation by coronary CT angiography: In vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Author: Matsumoto H, Watanabe S, Kyo E, Tsuji T, Ando Y, Otaki Y, Cadet S, Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Dey D, Tamarappoo BK.
    Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(4):219-225. PubMed ID: 30782511.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: It has been shown that CT attenuation of noncalcified plaques depends on luminal contrast attenuation (LCA). Although tube potential (kilovolt [kV]) has been shown to exert influence on plaque attenuation through LCA as well as its direct effects, in-vivo studies have not investigated plaque attenuation at lower tube potentials less than 120 kV. We sought to evaluate the effect of kV and LCA on thresholds for lipid-rich and fibrous plaques as defined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS: CT attenuation of IVUS-defined plaque components (lipid-rich, fibrous, and calcified plaques) were quantified in 52 consecutive patients with unstable angina, who had coronary CT angiography performed at 100 kV (n = 25) or 120 kV (n = 27) using kV-adjusted contrast protocol prior to IVUS. CT attenuation of plaque components was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: LCA was similar in the 100-kV and 120-kV groups (417.6 ± 83.7 Hounsfield Units [HU] vs 421.3 ± 54.9 HU, p = 0.77). LCA correlated with CT attenuation of lipid-rich (r = 0.49, p = 0.001) and fibrous plaques (r = 0.32, p < 0.05), but not with that of calcified plaques (r = 0.04, p = 0.81). When plaque attenuation was normalized to LCA, lipid-rich (0.087 ± 0.036, range -0.012-0.147) and fibrous plaque attenuation (0.234 ± 0.056, range 0.153-0.394) were distinct (p < 0.001) with no overlap for both kV groups. CT attenuation was not significantly different between 100-kV and 120-kV groups for lipid-rich (34.0 ± 21.5 vs 39.3 ± 12.9, p = 0.33) or fibrous plaques (95.4 ± 19.1 vs 97.6 ± 22.0, p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Plaque attenuation thresholds for non-calcified plaque components should be adjusted based on LCA. Further adjustment may not be required for different tube potentials.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]