These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The utility of 82Rb PET for myocardial viability assessment: Comparison with perfusion-metabolism 82Rb-18F-FDG PET.
    Author: Moody JB, Hiller KM, Lee BC, Poitrasson-Rivière A, Corbett JR, Weinberg RL, Murthy VL, Ficaro EP.
    Journal: J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Apr; 26(2):374-386. PubMed ID: 30809755.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: 82Rb kinetics may distinguish scar from viable but dysfunctional (hibernating) myocardium. We sought to define the relationship between 82Rb kinetics and myocardial viability compared with conventional 82Rb and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) perfusion-metabolism PET imaging. METHODS: Consecutive patients (N = 120) referred for evaluation of myocardial viability prior to revascularization and normal volunteers (N = 37) were reviewed. Dynamic 82Rb 3D PET data were acquired at rest. 18F-FDG 3D PET data were acquired after metabolic preparation using a standardized hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. 82Rb kinetic parameters K1, k2, and partition coefficient (KP) were estimated by compartmental modeling RESULTS: Segmental 82Rb k2 and KP differed significantly between scarred and hibernating segments identified by Rb-FDG perfusion-metabolism (k2, 0.42 ± 0.25 vs. 0.22 ± 0.09 min-1; P < .0001; KP, 1.33 ± 0.62 vs. 2.25 ± 0.98 ml/g; P < .0001). As compared to Rb-FDG analysis, segmental Rb KP had a c-index, sensitivity and specificity of 0.809, 76% and 84%, respectively, for distinguishing hibernating and scarred segments. Segmental k2 performed similarly, but with lower specificity (75%, P < .001) CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, 82Rb kinetic parameters k2 and KP, which are readily estimated using a compartmental model commonly used for myocardial blood flow, reliably differentiated hibernating myocardium and scar. Further study is necessary to evaluate their clinical utility for predicting benefit after revascularization.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]