These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Clinical significance of CTP combined with ABIC score in predicting the short-term prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure]. Author: Cao D, Li DJ, Wang Y, Zhang YH, Chen LY, Wang LC. Journal: Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi; 2019 Feb 20; 27(2):118-122. PubMed ID: 30818916. Abstract: Objective: To investigate the risk factors affecting the short-term prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF), and establish a new scoring model to predict the short-term prognosis of patients. Methods: This study enrolled 222 patients with HBV-ACLF. According to their clinical outcomes during hospitalization and 90 days after discharge, they were divided into survival and death group. Clinical data were collected to calculate the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI), and age-bilirubin-international normalized ratio-creatinine (ABIC) scores for prognosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the independent risk factors affecting 90-day mortality in HBV-ACLF patients. Cox regression model was used to establish a new prediction model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate short-term prognostic value of the models. K-M survival curve was used to predict the prognosis of patients. Results: CTP and ABIC scores were independent risk factors for 90-day mortality in HBV-ACLF patients, and the risk of death from liver failure had increased with increase of score. Cox regression model established a new predictive model CTP-ABIC = 0.551 × CTP + 0.297 × ABIC. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of all three scoring models (CTP, ABIC and CTP-ABIC) were 0.878, 0.829, 0.927, respectively. CTP-ABIC score was superior to the CTP and ABIC score (P value < 0.001). Patients with CTP-ABIC score ≥9.08 had higher mortality rate than patients with CTP-ABIC score < 9.08, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: All three scoring systems can predict short-term prognosis in patients with HBV-ACLF, but the accuracy of CTP-ABIC is superior. 目的: 探讨影响乙型肝炎相关性慢加急性肝衰竭(HBV-ACLF)短期预后的危险因素,并建立新的评分模型预测患者短期预后。 方法: 研究共纳入222例HBV-ACLF患者,根据其住院期间及出院后90 d的临床转归分为生存组和死亡组,分别收集临床资料进行肝功能评分(CTP)、终末期肝病模型(MELD)、白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)、年龄-胆红素-白蛋白-肌酐(ABIC)评分,多因素logical回归法分析影响HBV-ACLF患者90 d病死率的独立危险因素后,通过Cox回归模型建立新的预测模型,应用受试者工作特征曲线评价模型对短期预后的价值,并用K-M生存曲线分析预测患者预后。 结果: CTP、ABIC评分是HBV-ACLF患者90 d病死率的独立危险因素,随着得分的增加,肝衰竭发生死亡的风险就会增加。Cox回归模型建立新的预测模型CTP-ABIC = 0.551×CTP + 0.297×ABIC,CTP、ABIC、CTP-ABIC三种评分模型的曲线下面积分别为0.878、0.829、0.927,CTP-ABIC评分优于CTP、ABIC评分,P值均< 0.001,差异均有统计学意义。CTP-ABIC评分≥9.08患者较CTP-ABIC评分< 9.08患者病死率增高,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。 结论: 三种评分系统均能较好地预测HBV-ACLF患者的短期预后,CTP-ABIC评分模型准确性更高。.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]