These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Surveillance of omadacycline activity tested against clinical isolates from the United States and Europe: Results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme, 2017.
    Author: Huband MD, Pfaller MA, Shortridge D, Flamm RK.
    Journal: J Glob Antimicrob Resist; 2019 Dec; 19():56-63. PubMed ID: 30825698.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Omadacycline is an aminomethylcycline antibacterial (oral and intravenous once-daily formulation) that recently (October 2018) received United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) against selected organism groups. This study tested omadacycline and comparators against 14 000 non-duplicate bacterial isolates that were prospectively collected during 2017 from medical centres in Europe (EUR; 7000 isolates) and the United States (USA; 7000 isolates). METHODS: Omadacycline was tested by broth microdilution following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M07-A11 (2018) methods. RESULTS: A total of 98.7% ofStaphylococcus aureus isolates were susceptible to omadacycline (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25mg/L; ABSSSI breakpoints) including 96.5% of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 99.8% of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, and 93.9% of tetracycline-resistant strains. Omadacycline activity was similar for Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC50/90 0.06/0.12mg/L; 98.6% susceptible [CABP breakpoints]), Streptococcus anginosus group (MIC50/90 0.06/0.06mg/L; 100.0% susceptible [ABSSSI breakpoints]), and Streptococcus pyogenes (MIC50/90 0.06/0.12mg/L; 97.7% susceptible [ABSSSI breakpoints]). Omadacycline demonstrated activity against Enterobacter cloacae species complex isolates (MIC50/90, 2/4mg/L; 91.2% susceptible [ABSSSI breakpoints]), Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC50/90, 2/8mg/L; 87.5% susceptible [CABP and ABSSSI breakpoints]), and inhibited 99.1% of Escherichia coli (MIC50/90, 0.5/2mg/L) isolates at ≤ 4mg/L. Omadacycline was active against Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90, 0.5/1mg/L; 99.8% susceptible [CABP breakpoints]), including all β-lactamase positive isolates, and inhibited 100.0% of Moraxella catarrhalis isolates at ≤ 0.25mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: The potent activity of omadacycline against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria indicates that omadacycline merits further study in serious infections in which multidrug resistance and mixed Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections may be of concern.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]