These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Multimodality imaging for real-time image-guided left ventricular lead placement during cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations.
    Author: Salden OAE, van den Broek HT, van Everdingen WM, Mohamed Hoesein FAA, Velthuis BK, Doevendans PA, Cramer MJ, Tuinenburg AE, Leufkens P, van Slochteren FJ, Meine M.
    Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 30847659.
    Abstract:
    This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of intra-procedural visualization of optimal pacing sites and image-guided left ventricular (LV) lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In fifteen patients (10 males, 68 ± 11 years, 7 with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction of 26 ± 5%), optimal pacing sites were identified pre-procedurally using cardiac imaging. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived scar and dyssynchrony maps were created for all patients. In six patients the anatomy of the left phrenic nerve (LPN) and coronary sinus ostium was assessed via a computed tomography (CT) scan. By overlaying the CMR and CT dataset onto live fluoroscopy, aforementioned structures were visualized during LV lead implantation. In the first nine patients, the platform was tested, yet, no real-time image-guidance was implemented. In the last six patients real-time image-guided LV lead placement was successfully executed. CRT implant and fluoroscopy times were similar to previous procedures and all leads were placed close to the target area but away from scarred myocardium and the LPN. Patients that received real-time image-guided LV lead implantation were paced closer to the target area compared to patients that did not receive real-time image-guidance (8 mm [IQR 0-22] vs 26 mm [IQR 17-46], p = 0.04), and displayed marked LV reverse remodeling at 6 months follow up with a mean LVESV change of -30 ± 10% and a mean LVEF improvement of 15 ± 5%. Real-time image-guided LV lead implantation is feasible and may prove useful for achieving the optimal LV lead position.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]