These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Individuals With Prediabetes Display Different Age-Related Pathophysiological Characteristics.
    Author: Fiorentino TV, Pedace E, Succurro E, Andreozzi F, Perticone M, Sciacqua A, Perticone F, Sesti G.
    Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2019 Jul 01; 104(7):2911-2924. PubMed ID: 30848793.
    Abstract:
    CONTEXT: Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) are highly pathophysiologic heterogeneous prediabetes conditions that can occur in all age groups, from youth to elderly people. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether distinct age-related phenotypes exist among individuals with IFG or IGT. RESEARCH DESIGN: 479 young (aged 18 to 35 years), 699 adult (45 to 55 years) and 240 older (≥65 years) subjects underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). From the OGTT results, the participants were grouped as follows: young age and normal glucose tolerance (NGT), adult age and NGT, older age and NGT, IFG young subjects, IFG adult subjects, IFG older subjects, IGT young (Y-IGT) subjects, IGT adult (A-IGT) subjects, and IGT older (O-IGT) subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Insulin sensitivity and secretion, insulin clearance, and β-cell function. RESULTS: Peripheral insulin sensitivity assessed using the Matsuda index, basal and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and β-cell function estimated using the disposition index were decreased in IFG adult subjects and IFG older subjects compared with IFG young subjects. A-IGT and Y-IGT subjects exhibited a progressively greater degree of hepatic insulin resistance assessed using the liver insulin resistance index, and reduced insulin clearance compared with O-IGT subjects. In contrast, the Matsuda index did not differ among Y-IGT, A-IGT, and O-IGT subjects. Basal and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and β-cell function were lower in A-IGT and O-IGT subjects compared with Y-IGT individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with IFG or IGT exhibited different age-related pathophysiologic characteristics. A more precise phenotyping of subjects with IGT or IFG could help to better design individualized preventive approaches to counteract diabetes progression.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]