These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of three platelet markers for measurement of platelet survival time in healthy volunteers.
    Author: Dewanjee MK, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Robertson JS, Offord KP, Fuster VD, Chesebro JH.
    Journal: Mayo Clin Proc; 1986 May; 61(5):327-36. PubMed ID: 3084883.
    Abstract:
    We studied mean platelet survival times in healthy volunteers with use of [51Cr]disodium chromate, 111In-oxine (in a solution of acid-citrate-dextrose [ACD] and saline), and 111In-tropolone (in ACD-plasma) as markers. Differences found between the 51Cr and 111In labels probably can be attributed to a variation in localization of the label on the cell and of renal handling of the free label after release. The mean platelet survival time with 51Cr was slightly longer than the survival time with both indium labels and showed a sex difference not seen with 111In-oxine. Protein-bound plasma 51Cr was lower than plasma 111In and remained constant throughout the study. Plasma 111In increased with time. For survival time calculations, no correction for free 51Cr is necessary, but correction should routinely be performed when 111In markers are used. Both 111In markers gave similar results with respect to platelet survival time. The somewhat more elaborate plasma labeling procedure with tropolone shows no measurable advantage over the original 111In-oxine method. 111In-tropolone labeling takes less time and maintains platelets in the physiologic environment of plasma during incubation. Biodistribution studies show no difference between the two 111In markers.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]