These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: STAT3 Modulation of Regulatory T Cells in Response to Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer.
    Author: Oweida AJ, Darragh L, Phan A, Binder D, Bhatia S, Mueller A, Court BV, Milner D, Raben D, Woessner R, Heasley L, Nemenoff R, Clambey E, Karam SD.
    Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst; 2019 Dec 01; 111(12):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 30863843.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Radioresistance represents a major problem in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. To improve response, understanding tumor microenvironmental factors that contribute to radiation resistance is important. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are enriched in numerous cancers and can dampen the response to radiation by creating an immune-inhibitory microenvironment. The purpose of this study was to investigate mechanisms of Treg modulation by radiation in HNC. METHODS: We utilized an orthotopic mouse model of HNC. Anti-CD25 was used for Treg depletion. Image-guided radiation was delivered to a dose of 10 Gy. Flow cytometry was used to analyze abundance and function of intratumoral immune cells. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to assess secreted factors. For immune-modulating therapies, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, and STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) were used. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Treatment with anti-CD25 and radiation led to tumor eradication (57.1%, n = 4 of 7 mice), enhanced T-cell cytotoxicity compared with RT alone (CD4 effector T cells [Teff]: RT group mean = 5.37 [ 0.58] vs RT + αCD25 group mean =10.71 [0.67], P = .005; CD8 Teff: RT group mean = 9.98 [0.81] vs RT + αCD25 group mean =16.88 [2.49], P = .01) and induced tumor antigen-specific memory response (100.0%, n = 4 mice). In contrast, radiation alone or when combined with anti-CTLA4 did not lead to durable tumor control (0.0%, n = 7 mice). STAT3 inhibition in combination with radiation, but not as a single agent, improved tumor growth delay, decreased Tregs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and M2 macrophages and enhanced effector T cells and M1 macrophages. Experiments in nude mice inhibited the benefit of STAT3 ASO and radiation. CONCLUSION: We propose that STAT3 inhibition is a viable and potent therapeutic target against Tregs. Our data support the design of clinical trials integrating STAT3 ASO in the standard of care for cancer patients receiving radiation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]