These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Author: Akolekar R, Ciobanu A, Zingler E, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH.
    Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 221(1):65.e1-65.e18. PubMed ID: 30878322.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Third-trimester studies in selected high-risk pregnancies have reported that low cerebroplacental ratio, due to high pulsatility index in the umbilical artery, and or decreased pulsatility index in the fetal middle cerebral artery, is associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictive performance of screening for adverse perinatal outcome by the cerebroplacental ratio measured routinely at 35-37 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study in 47,211 women with singleton pregnancies undergoing routine ultrasound examination at 35+6 to 37+6 weeks' gestation, including measurement of umbilical artery-pulsatility index and middle cerebral artery-pulsatility index. The measured umbilical artery-pulsatility index and middle cerebral artery-pulsatility index and their ratio were converted to multiples of the median after adjustment for gestational age. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether umbilical artery-pulsatility index, middle cerebral artery-pulsatility index, and cerebroplacental ratio improved the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome that was provided by maternal characteristics, medical history, and obstetric factors. The following outcome measures were considered: (1) adverse perinatal outcome consisting of stillbirth, neonatal death, or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy grades 2 and 3; (2) presence of surrogate markers of perinatal hypoxia consisting of umbilical arterial or venous cord blood pH ≤7 and ≤7.1, respectively, 5-minute Apgar score <7, or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit for >24 hours; (3) cesarean delivery for presumed fetal compromise in labor; and (4) neonatal birthweight less than the third percentile for gestational age. RESULTS: First, the incidence of adverse perinatal outcome, presence of surrogate markers of perinatal hypoxia, and cesarean delivery for presumed fetal compromise in labor was greater in pregnancies with small for gestational age neonates with birthweight <10th percentile compared with appropriate for gestational age neonates; however, 80%-85% of these adverse events occurred in the appropriate for gestational age group. Second, low cerebroplacental ratio <10th percentile was associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome, presence of surrogate markers of perinatal hypoxia, cesarean delivery for presumed fetal compromise in labor, and birth of neonates with birthweight less than third percentile. However, multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that the prediction of these adverse outcomes by maternal demographic characteristics and medical history was only marginally improved by the addition of cerebroplacental ratio. Third, the performance of low cerebroplacental ratio in the prediction of each adverse outcome was poor, with detection rates of 13%-26% and a false-positive rate of about 10%. Fourth, the detection rates of adverse outcomes were greater in small for gestational age than in appropriate for gestational age babies and in pregnancies delivering within 2 weeks rather than at any stage after assessment; however, such increase in detection rates was accompanied by an increase in the false-positive rate. Fifth, in appropriate for gestational age neonates, the predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio was low, with positive and negative likelihood ratios ranging from 1.21 to 1.82, and 0.92 to 0.98, respectively; although the accuracy was better in small for gestational age neonates, this was also low with positive likelihood ratios of 1.31-2.26 and negative likelihood ratios of 0.69-0.92. Similar values were obtained in fetuses classified as small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age according to the estimated fetal weight. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnancies undergoing routine antenatal assessment at 35-37 weeks' gestation, measurement of cerebroplacental ratio provides poor prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in both small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age fetuses.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]