These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Hybrid of Compressed Sensing and Parallel Imaging Applied to Three-dimensional Isotropic T2-weighted Turbo Spin-echo MR Imaging of the Lumbar Spine.
    Author: Morita K, Nakaura T, Maruyama N, Iyama Y, Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Namimoto T, Kitajima M, Yoneyama M, Yamashita Y.
    Journal: Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Feb 10; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 30880300.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The hybrid compressed sensing (hybrid-CS) technique can shorten the acquisition time compared with the sensitivity encoding (SENSE) technique in lumbar MRI. To evaluate the feasibility of a hybrid-CS technique in comparison with 3D isotropic T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (3D volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition [VISTA]) MRI of the lumbar spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approved this study and informed consent was obtained from participants prior to study entry. Sixteen healthy volunteers underwent lumbar spine 3D VISTA with conventional parallel imaging for SENSE and hybrid-CS at 3T. We recorded the image acquisition times of SENSE and hybrid-CS. We compared the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in spine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), lumbar disc, epidural fat, and erector spinae muscle, and the contrast of spine, CSF, and disc, and performed qualitative image analysis assessment, between the two image sequences. RESULTS: The image acquisition time for hybrid-CS was 39.2% shorter than that of SENSE (218.4/358.8 s). The contrast of CSF and SNR of the spine was significantly higher with hybrid-CS than with SENSE (P < 0.05). The SNR of the disc and muscle was significantly higher with SENSE than with hybrid-CS (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the contrast of spine, disc, and fat, and SNR of CSF and fat between hybrid-CS and SENSE. There were no significant differences in the qualitative evaluation between hybrid-CS and SENSE. CONCLUSION: Compared with SENSE, hybrid-CS for 3D VISTA can shorten image acquisition time without sacrificing image quality.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]