These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Degree of implementation of structured answering of emergency calls in German emergency dispatch centers and effects of the introduction in daily practice].
    Author: Luiz T, Marung H, Pollach G, Hackstein A.
    Journal: Anaesthesist; 2019 May; 68(5):282-293. PubMed ID: 30899970.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The emergency call-taking process is crucial for the adequate disposition of emergency vehicles and the provision of first aid instructions. Moreover, it has a direct impact on the quality of out-of-hospital emergency care. Organizations such as the European Resuscitation Council, the German Federal Association of Emergency Medical Directors and the German Association of Emergency Dispatch Centers call for the nationwide implementation of a formal call-taking process in emergency dispatching. This is required for the provision of telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR). METHODS: This article presents the results of an online survey among members of the German Association of Emergency Dispatch Centers on the implementation of structured call-taking programs. The survey comprised data on the implementation of a structured call-taking process, its effects on important quality indicators such as the frequency of T‑CPR and employee satisfaction. RESULTS: Of the 100 participants who completed the survey, 49 already used formal call-taking systems and 24 (47%) of the remaining 51 emergency dispatch centers intended to implement such a system. Formal call-taking systems were mainly used in the dispatch of emergency medical services (98% of emergency dispatch centers using a formal call-taking system) and fire brigades (83.7% of emergency dispatch centers using a formal call-taking system). In 42 (85.7%) of the 49 emergency dispatch centers using a formal call-taking process, this process is mandatory; however, only 27 (64.3%) reported compliance rates of more than 95% in medical emergencies. Comparing the pre-post results after the introduction of a structured approach, the quality of the inquiries improved for almost all emergency dispatch centers. On the other hand, important quality indicators, e.g. mean dispatch initiation time or the necessity of subsequently alerting an advanced life support unit to the scene, were not recorded in 42.9% and 49.0% of the dispatch centers, respectively. Of the emergency dispatch centers that analyzed the frequency of T‑CPR, 94.3% could show an increase in T‑CPR. Moreover, 79.5% of the respondents reported improved employee satisfaction. Whereas the demand for dispatchers remained nearly static, 24 out of the 49 dispatch centers that used a formal call-taking system set up new posts for quality management (maximum: 3 posts in dispatch centers handling more than 250,000 missions annually). CONCLUSION: Structured emergency call-taking has not yet been comprehensively implemented in German emergency dispatch centers. Wherever it is used consistently, important quality parameters are improved. Further investigations should aim to identify crucial factors for its implementation and to analyze additional quality parameters.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]