These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Laparoscopic Splenectomy: Has It Become the Standard Surgical Approach in Pediatric Patients?
    Author: Utria AF, Goffredo P, Keck K, Shelton JS, Shilyansky J, Hassan I.
    Journal: J Surg Res; 2019 Aug; 240():109-114. PubMed ID: 30925411.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Splenectomy is often required in the pediatric population as part of the treatment of hematologic disorders and can be performed laparoscopically or open. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) splenectomies using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP-P) data set. METHODS: The NSQIP-P data set was used to identify children who underwent elective splenectomy between January 2012 and December 2016. Thirty-day outcomes between OS and LS, and LS alone and concurrent LS and cholecystectomy were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Most of the splenectomies (91%) were performed laparoscopically. There was no difference in overall complications between OS (n = 60) and LS (n = 613), although OS had a higher risk of perioperative transfusion (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.52-6.69). LS was associated with a shorter median hospital length of stay (2 versus 4 d, P < 0.001) and similar mean operative times compared to OS (120 versus 133 min, P = 0.559). There was no difference in outcomes of children undergoing LS versus LS and concurrent cholecystectomy (n = 129). CONCLUSIONS: LS has become the standard approach for elective splenectomies in the pediatric population and has minimal morbidity, and when indicated, concurrent cholecystectomies do not increase the risk of complications. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]