These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of the reproducibility of two cine-derived strain software programmes in disease states.
    Author: Graham-Brown MP, Gulsin GS, Parke K, Wormleighton J, Lai FY, Athithan L, Arnold JR, Burton JO, McCann GP, Singh AS.
    Journal: Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():51-58. PubMed ID: 30927959.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Systolic strain and peak-early diastolic strain rate (PEDSR) measure subclinical cardiac dysfunction. These parameters can be derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images using new software packages, but the comparative test-retest reproducibility of these software in disease states is unknown. This study compared the test-retest reproducibility of strain measures derived from two software packages (feature-tracking software (FT) and tissue-tracking (TT)) in disease populations with preserved ejection fractions. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 10 patients with aortic stenosis (AS), 10 haemodialysis patients and 10 diabetic patients at 1.5 and 3-Tesla. 30 subjects underwent test-retest reproducibility scans of global circumferential strain (GCS), global longitudinal strain (GLS), circumferential-PEDSR and longitudinal-PEDSR calculated using TT and FT software. RESULTS: Test-retest reproducibility of GCS and GLS were similar for FT and TT across patient groups. Coefficient of variability (CoV) for FT-derived GCS 8.1%, 5% and 7.9% for AS, diabetic and haemodialysis patients, compared to 3.3%, 9.2% and 5.4% for TT-derived GCS, with CoV for FT-derived GLS 8%, 6.4% and 8.2% for AS, diabetic and haemodialysis patients, compared to 5.3%, 4.8% and 7% for TT-derived GLS). Reproducibility of FT-derived circumferential and longitudinal-PEDSR was worse than TT-derived circumferential and longitudinal-PEDSR (CoV for FT-derived circumferential-PEDSR 18.2%, 18% and 17.4% for AS, diabetic and haemodialysis patients, compared to 6.1%, 11.7% and 11% for TT-derived circumferential-PEDSR with CoV for FT-derived longitudinal PEDSR 18.2%, 18.9%, 18.3% for AS, diabetic and haemodialysis patients, compared to 8.9%, 9.1% and 11.4% for TT-derived longitudinal-PEDSR). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no systematic bias with tighter limits of agreement for TT-derived strain measures. CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of GCS and GLS are excellent with FT and TT software across diseases. TT had superior test-retest reproducibility for quantification of longitudinal and circumferential-PEDSR than FT-derived PEDSR across diseases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]