These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reactions of tumors and normal tissues in mice to irradiation in the presence and absence of a perfluorochemical emulsion.
    Author: Rockwell S, Mate TP, Irvin CG, Nierenburg M.
    Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1986 Aug; 12(8):1315-8. PubMed ID: 3093416.
    Abstract:
    The effect of pre-treatment with the perfluorochemical emulsion, Fluosol-DA, on the radiation response of normal tissues and EMT6 mammary tumors in BALB/c mice was examined. Pre-treating tumor-bearing mice with .015 ml/g of Fluosol and 30 min of carbogen (95% O2/5% CO2) increased the number of tumor cells killed by irradiation with doses of 2.5-20 Gy; the change in the radiation dose-response curve was consistent with a reduction in the hypoxic fraction. Fluosol did not alter the response of tumors in air-breathing or N2-asphyxiated mice and carbogen alone did not alter the radiation response of this tumor significantly. Carbogen treatments 5-60 min in duration produced similar enhancements of tumor radiosensitivity in Fluosol-treated animals. Pre-treatment with Fluosol plus carbogen also increased the number of tumor cells killed by a fractionated regimen of four 2.5 Gy fractions given over 2 days. Pre-treatment with Fluosol-DA plus carbogen, therefore, increased the antineoplastic effects of radiotherapy in both single-dose and multi-fraction radiation regimens. In contrast, Fluosol did not increase the effect of radiation on the partially committed (CFU-GM) or pluripotent (CFU-S) stem cells of the bone marrow or on the CFU-GM of the spleen. The radiation response of the skin was only slightly enhanced by pre-treatment with Fluosol plus carbogen. These data show that treatment of mice with perfluorochemical emulsions plus carbogen can produce therapeutic gain by improving the radiation response of solid tumors, without producing an equivalent increase in the radiation response of potentially dose-limiting normal tissues. These findings encourage further evaluations of these agents as adjuncts to clinical radiotherapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]