These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Highly-calcific carotid lesions endovascular management in symptomatic and increased-stroke-risk asymptomatic patients using the CGuard™ dual-layer carotid stent system: Analysis from the PARADIGM study.
    Author: Mazurek A, Partyka L, Trystula M, Jakala J, Proniewska K, Borratynska A, Tomaszewski T, Slezak M, Malinowski KP, Drazkiewicz T, Podolec P, Rosenfiled K, Musialek P.
    Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul 01; 94(1):149-156. PubMed ID: 30945420.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility, safety, angiographic, and clinical outcome of highly-calcific carotid stenosis (HCCS) endovascular management using CGuard™ dual-layer carotid stents. BACKGROUND: HCCS has been a challenge to carotid artery stenting (CAS) using conventional stents. CGuard combines a high-radial-force open-cell frame conformability with MicroNet sealing properties. METHODS: The PARADIGM study is prospectively assessing routine CGuard use in all-comer carotid revascularization patients; the focus of the present analysis is HCCS versus non-HCCS lesions. Angiographic HCCS (core laboratory evaluation) required calcific segment length to lesion length ≥2/3, minimal calcification thickness ≥3 mm, circularity (≥3 quadrants), and calcification severity grade ≥3 (carotid calcification severity scoring system [CCSS]; G0-G4). RESULTS: One hundred and one consecutive patients (51-86 years, 54.4% symptomatic; 106 lesions) received CAS (16 HCCS and 90 non-HCCS); eight others (two HCCS) were treated surgically. CCSS evaluation was reproducible, with weighted kappa (95% CI) of 0.73 (0.58-0.88) and 0.83 (0.71-0.94) for inter- and intra-observer reproducibility respectively. HCCS postdilatation pressures were higher than those in non-HCCS; 22 (20-24) versus 20 (18-24) atm, p = .028; median (Q1-Q3). Angiography-optimized HCCS-CAS was feasible and free of contrast extravasation or clinical complications. Overall residual diameter stenosis was single-digit but it was higher in HCCS; 9 (4-17) versus 3 (1-7) %, p = .002. At 30 days and 12 months HCCS in-stent velocities were normal and there were no adverse clinical events. CONCLUSION: CGuard HCCS endovascular management was feasible and safe. A novel algorithm to grade carotid artery calcification severity was reproducible and applicable in clinical study setting. Larger HCCS series and longer-term follow-up are warranted.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]