These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Impact of neointimal tissue characterization and heterogeneity of bare-metal stents and drug-eluting stents on the time course after stent implantation evaluated by integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound.
    Author: Yoshizane T, Tanaka S, Abe S, Ueno T, Goto Y, Kojima T, Iwama M, Arai M, Noda T, Kawasaki M.
    Journal: Heart Vessels; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1639-1649. PubMed ID: 30997558.
    Abstract:
    Pathological studies have suggested the different process of in-stent restenosis (ISR) of bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES). Here, we evaluated the components of neointimal tissue using integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound (IB-IVUS) and focused on the time course after stent implantation and tissue signal distribution. We evaluated 125 lesions of 125 patients who underwent target lesion revascularization for ISR (BMS: n = 73, DES: n = 52). Volume analysis of a 4-mm length centered on a minimum lumen area in every 1-mm cross-sectional area was performed. For IB-IVUS analysis, color-coded maps were constructed from the default setting based on the integrated backscatter (IB) values (middle-IB value, green: fibrous and low-IB value, blue: lipid pool). For the neointimal tissue volume, we evaluated the ratios of the green (%G) and blue (%B) areas. Tissue signal distribution (TD) was also obtained from the default setting based on IB values in each pixel of IB-IVUS imaging. We compared values of neointimal tissues measured by IB-IVUS between the DES and BMS and time course. The observed period was longer after BMS implantation than after DES implantation (BMS: 2545 days, DES: 1233 days, p < 0.001). Overall, %G and %B were similar between the BMS and DES groups (%G: 55% and 51%, respectively, p = 0.10; %B: 36% and 38%, respectively, p = 0.51); however, TD was significantly higher in the DES group than in the BMS group (1091 vs. 1367, p < 0.001). TD in the DES group remained high during the follow-up periods. However, TD in the BMS group was low in the early phase and significantly increased over time (r = 0.56, p < 0.001). When analyzing the ISR within 2 years after stent implantation, the BMS was distinguished with a sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 90% (cut-off value: TD = 1135, area under the curve 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.92). TD could differentiate neointimal tissue after BMS implantation in the early phase. TD can be a useful index in the observation of neoatherosclerosis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]