MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Reducing Radiation Dose and Improving Image Quality in CT Portal Venography Using 80 kV and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V in Slender Patients.
Author: Ren Z, Zhang X, Hu Z, Li D, Liu Z, Wei D, Jia Y, Yu N, Yu Y, Lei Y, Chen X, Guo C, Ren Z, He T.
Journal: Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):233-243. PubMed ID: 31031186.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of reducing radiation dose and improving image quality in CT portal venography (CTPV) using 80 kV and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V(ASIR-V) in slender patients in comparison with conventional protocol using 120 kV and ASIR. METHODS: Sixty slender patients for enhanced abdominal CT scanning were randomly divided into group A and group B. Group A used the conventional 120 kV tube voltage, 600 mgI/kg contrast dose and reconstructed with the recommended 40% ASIR. Group B used 80 kV tube voltage, 350 mgI/kg contrast dose and reconstructed with ASIR-V from 40% to 100% with 10% interval. The CT values and standard deviation (SD) values of the main portal vein, left branch, and right branch of portal vein, liver, and erector spinae at the same level were measured to calculate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The image quality was subjectively scored by two experienced radiologists blindly using a 5-point criterion. The contrast dose, volumetric CT dose index, and dose length product were recorded in both groups and the effective dose was calculated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups (p > 0.05), the effective dose and contrast dose in group B were reduced by 63.3% (p < 0.001) and 39.7% (p < 0.001), respectively compared with group A. With the percentage of ASIR-V increased in group B, the CT values showed no significant difference, while the SD values gradually decreased and SNR values and CNR values increased accordingly. Compared with group A, group B demonstrated similar CT values (p > 0.05), while the SD values with 80% ASIR-V to 100% ASIR-V were significantly lower than those of 40% ASIR (p < 0.001), and the SNR values and CNR values with 70% ASIR-V to 100% ASIR-V were significantly higher than those of 40% ASIR (p < 0.001). The subjective image quality scores by the two radiologists had excellent consistency (kappa value>0.75, p < 0.001), and the final subjective image quality scores and the subjective scores in each of the 5 scoring categories with 60% ASIR-V to 100% ASIR-V were all significantly higher than those of 40% ASIR, and 80% ASIR-V obtained the highest subjective score among different reconstructions. CONCLUSION: In CTPV, the application of 80 kV and ASIR-V reconstruction in slender patients can significantly reduce radiation dose (by 63.3%) and contrast agent dose (by 39.7%). Compared with the recommended 40% ASIR using 120 kV, ASIR-V with 80% to 100% percentages can further improve image quality and with 80% ASIR-V being the best reconstruction algorithm. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CTPV with 80 kV and ASIR-V algorithm in slender patients can significantly reduce radiation dose and contrast agent dose as well as improve image quality, compared with the conventional 120 kV protocol using 40% ASIR.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]