These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A Comparative Planning Analysis and Integral Dose of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, Helical Tomotherapy, and Three-dimensional Conformal Craniospinal Irradiation for Pediatric Medulloblastoma.
    Author: Patel S, Drodge S, Jacques A, Warkentin H, Powell K, Chafe S.
    Journal: J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2015 Jun; 46(2):134-140. PubMed ID: 31052086.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with helical tomotherapy (HT) and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in children with medulloblastoma. METHODS: Five children treated with 3D-CRT were retrospectively replanned with HT and VMAT. Tomotherapy plans used a single helical arc, thereby eliminating field junctions. VMAT plans used two arcs rotating alternatively clockwise and counterclockwise, respectively. Conformity and homogeneity indices, dose-volume histograms, integral doses, monitor units delivered, and beam-on times were compared. RESULTS: VMAT showed an improved mean conformity index of 1.05 in comparison with 3D-CRT (1.58, P = .04) and HT (1.34, P = .04). The mean homogeneity index of VMAT (1.13) was not significantly different from 3D-CRT (1.16) but higher than HT (1.08, P = .04). For normal tissues, VMAT resulted in a lower mean dose to the skin, eyes, lenses, optic nerves, cochlea, esophagus, heart, peritoneal cavity, bladder, and rectum compared with 3D-CRT (all P = .04). There were few significant differences in dose-volume statistics for normal tissues between VMAT and HT. The mean nontarget tissue integral dose for VMAT of 80.8 J was significantly lower than for 3D-CRT (91.5 J, P = .04) and HT (95.6 J, P = .04). Body and nontarget tissue integral doses were lowest with VMAT in every patient. CONCLUSIONS: For CSI, VMAT provides comparable normal tissue sparing with tomotherapy and may reduce the integral dose. Compared with 3D-CRT, VMAT improved normal tissue sparing at higher doses despite larger volumes receiving lower doses. These findings have potential implications in the risk of the development of late adverse effects and radiation-related second malignancies in children with curable primary disease.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]