These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Risk Stratification and Prognosticators of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Study of the Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Working Group of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
    Author: Harada K, Konuma T, Machida S, Mori J, Aoki J, Uchida N, Ohashi K, Fukuda T, Tanaka M, Ikegame K, Ozawa Y, Iwato K, Eto T, Onizuka M, Ichinohe T, Atsuta Y, Yano S.
    Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2019 Sep; 25(9):1730-1743. PubMed ID: 31054982.
    Abstract:
    Although the prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) is worse than that of AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS), transplantation outcomes and prognosticators of AML-MRC patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remain unclear. Transplantation outcomes of AML-MRC (n = 4091) were compared with those of AML-NOS (n = 3964) in patients who underwent allo-SCT between 2003 and 2016 using a nationwide registration database. The 3-year overall survival (OS; 35.5% versus 50.6%) was lower and the relapse (42.3% versus 32.1%) and nonrelapse mortality (26.3% versus 22.0%) rates were higher in the AML-MRC group than in the AML-NOS group. Based on the hierarchical AML-MRC classification, myelodysplasia as the sole criterion was associated with better OS compared with AML-NOS, whereas monosomal or complex karyotype and -5/del(5q) were associated with poor OS. A history of myelodysplastic syndrome and -7/del(7q) did not affect OS. Accordingly, AML-MRC with complex karyotype or -5/del(5q) and that with monosomal karyotype were classified as intermediate and high risks, respectively, whereas the remaining cases were classified as low risk. The 3-year OS rates were 50.7%, 36.9%, and 13.8% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P < .001). Risk classification, older age, and low performance status score were significant risk factors for survival in AML-MRC, independently of the disease status. Grades I to II acute graft-versus-host disease significantly reduced the 3-year relapse (24.7% versus 31.6%), leading to better survival (hazard ratio, .64). Our prognostic risk stratification can potentially aid in elucidating the diverse transplantation outcomes in patients with AML-MRC.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]