These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Utility of Stack-of-stars Acquisition for Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging without Breath-holding. Author: Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Kromrey ML, Tamada D, Wakayama T, Wang K, Cashen TA, Ersoz A, Onishi H. Journal: Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 May 01; 19(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 31061270. Abstract: PURPOSE: Post-contrast liver magnetic resonance imaging is typically performed with breath-hold 3D gradient echo sequences. However, breath-holding for >10 s is difficult for some patients. In this study, we compared the quality of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging without breath-holding using the prototype pulse sequences stack-of-stars liver acquisition with volume acceleration (LAVA) (LAVA Star) with or without navigator echoes (LAVA Starnavi+ and LAVA Starnavi-) and Cartesian LAVA with navigator echoes (Cartesian LAVAnavi+). METHODS: Seventy-two patients were included in this single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. HBP imaging using the three LAVA sequences (Cartesian LAVAnavi+, LAVA Starnavi-, and LAVA Starnavi+) without breath-holding was performed for all patients using a 3T magnetic resonance system. Two independent radiologists qualitatively analyzed (overall image quality, liver edge sharpness, hepatic vein clarity, streak artifacts, and respiratory motion/pulsation artifacts) HBP images taken by the three sequences using a five-point scale. Quantitative evaluations were also performed by calculating the liver-to-spleen, -lesion, and -portal vein (PV) signal intensity ratios. The results were compared between the three sequences using the Friedman test. RESULTS: LAVA Starnavi+ showed the best image quality and hepatic vein clarity (P < 0.0001). LAVA Starnavi- showed the lowest image quality (P < 0.0001-0.0106). LAVA Starnavi+ images showed fewer streak artifacts than LAVA Starnavi- images (P < 0.0001), while Cartesian LAVAnavi+ images showed no streak artifacts. Cartesian LAVAnavi+ images showed stronger respiratory motion/pulsation artifacts than the others (P < 0.0001). LAVA Starnavi- images showed the highest liver-to-spleen ratios (P < 0.0001-0.0005). Cartesian LAVAnavi+ images showed the lowest liver-to-lesion and -PV ratios (P < 0.0001-0.0108). CONCLUSION: In terms of image quality, the combination of stack-of-stars acquisition and navigator echoes is the best for HBP imaging without breath-holding.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]