These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is conversion of decimal visual acuity measurements to logMAR values reliable?
    Author: Mataftsi A, Koutsimpogeorgos D, Brazitikos P, Ziakas N, Haidich AB.
    Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 257(7):1513-1517. PubMed ID: 31069515.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To assess if conversion of decimal visual acuity (VA) to logMAR is reliable for clinical and research purposes. METHODS: Right eye VA of 74 consecutive patients was measured with 5 min interval, using (a) the ETDRS chart (VAlog), (b) a decimal chart at 6 m (VA6m), and (c) a decimal chart at 4 m (VA4m). VA was the smallest line whereby four of five optotypes were correctly identified. Decimal scores were converted to logMAR using the formula logMAR = -log(decimal acuity). The agreement between VAlog, VA4m, and VA6m was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis of the difference between VAlog and VA6m or VA4m showed a significant slope (p = 0.001), with greater disagreement at higher VA values, i.e., poorer acuity. There was considerable lack of agreement, with discrepancies of up to 0.2 logMAR when VA was measured around 0.5 logMAR. CONCLUSION: Converting decimal VA to logMAR produces overestimation of its true value, especially in lower acuities.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]