These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cadence impact on cardiopulmonary, metabolic and biomechanical loading during downhill running.
    Author: Vincent HK, Massengill C, Harris A, Chen C, Wasser JG, Bruner M, Vincent KR.
    Journal: Gait Posture; 2019 Jun; 71():186-191. PubMed ID: 31075662.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Distance runners can approach long descents with slow cadence and long steps, or a fast cadence with shorter steps. These approaches differentially affect mechanical loading and energy demand. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study determined the cadence range in which biomechanical loads, caloric unit cost and energy cost were simultaneously minimized during downhill running (DR). METHODS: Trained runners (N = 40; 25.6 ± 7.2 yr; 42.5% female) participated in this experimental study. Participants ran on an instrumented treadmill while wearing a portable gas analyzer during six conditions: control normal level running (LR) at 0 deg inclination (CON-0); control DR -6 deg inclinaton (CON-6); DR at cadences +/-5% and +/-10% different from CON-6. A motion analysis system was used to capture running motion, and an instrumented treadmill captured force data. Cardiopulmonary measures, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and biomechanical measures (temporal spatial parameters, peak ground reaction forces [GRF], vertical average loading rate [VALR], impulses) were calculated. Caloric unit cost and energy costs were standardized per unit distance. RESULTS: Running at -10% cadence increased HR by 10 bpm compared to CON-6 (p < 0.0001). Vertical excursion of the center of mass and step length were greatest in the cadence -10% and least in the cadence +10% conditions (both p < 0.0001). RPEs were higher among all cadence conditions compared to CON-0 (p < 0.0001). Caloric unit costs were lowest in CON-6, and +/5% cadence conditions compared to the CON-0 and +/-10% conditions (-2.1% to -12.3%, respectively; p < 0.05). Peak GRF and VALR were not different among conditions; vertical impulses were greatest in the -10% condition compared to CON-0, CON-6 and +5% and +10% by 11.3-14.5% (p < .001). SIGNIFICANCE: Changing cadence across level and downhill stretches is likely not necessary and may actually increase perceived effort of running. Running downhill at cadences that range +/-5% of preferred simultaneously minimize caloric unit cost and impulse loading.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]