These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [The application of measles specific IgM and IgG antibody detection in classification measles vaccine failure, Tianjin].
    Author: Ding YX, Mao NY, Zhang Y, Gao ZG, Xu WW.
    Journal: Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 May 06; 53(5):508-512. PubMed ID: 31091610.
    Abstract:
    Objective: To study the application of measles specific IgM and IgG antibody detection in classification of primary vaccination failure (PVF) and secondary vaccination failure (SVF). Methods: Measles surveillance information system was used to collect measles confirmed cases in Tianjin, 2013-2015, and their blood specimens were collected, totally 284 cases were enrolled. Measles IgM and IgG were detected with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the relative avidity index (RAI) was used to express the result of measles avidity. Measles IgM, IgG and IgM/IgG was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) as evaluation indicators. In addition, compared with a measles outbreak (26 cases) of a middle school in Tianjin in 2016, for making further verification on the diagnostic value of vaccination failure with IgM, IgG and IgM/IgG. Results: The age of cases ranged was 0-58 years old, the interval median (P(25), P(75)) of serum collection after rash onset was 2 (1, 4) days. The positive rate of measles IgM and IgG in acute phase specimens were 76.06% (216 cases) and 88.38% (251 cases). According to the ROC curve analysis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of IgM, IgG and IgM/IgG were 0.753, 0.891 and 0.952, indicating that IgM/IgG was the best index to distinguish PVF and SVF. The best cut off value for IgM/IgG was 0.06, the sensibility and specificity were 88.75% and 86.63%. When IgM/IgG >1, 96.30% cases were low-avidity (RAI <40%), only 1 case was equivocal response (RAI: 40%-60%). 97.14% cases were high-avidity (RAI >60%) when IgM/IgG <0.01, only 3 cases were equivocal response (RAI 40%-60%). The threshold of IgM/IgG was used to verify the measles outbreak of a middle school in Tianjin, 2016. In the acute phase specimens, 100% (26 cases) of IgM/IgG were <0.06, 84.62% (22 cases) of IgM/IgG were <0.01. Conclusion: The detection of measles IgM and IgG with ELISA, and IgM/IgG is a valuable diagnostic tool to distinguish PVF and SVF. 目的： 探讨麻疹IgM和IgG抗体在判定原发性免疫失败（PVF）和继发性免疫失败（SVF）的应用。 方法： 以中国疾病预防控制信息系统中2013—2015年天津市上报的麻疹确诊病例为研究对象，获取其血清标本，共284例。采用ELISA检测麻疹IgM和IgG抗体，通过相对亲和力指数（RAI）判定亲和力检测结果；采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析麻疹IgM、IgG和IgM/IgG评价方法，利用曲线下面积（AUC）比较不同指标的判定价值。同时，对2016年天津市一起中学麻疹暴发（26例）进行分析，验证麻疹IgM、IgG和IgM/IgG评价方法在判定疫苗免疫失败的诊断价值。 结果： 研究对象年龄为0~58岁，采样间隔M（P(25)，P(75)）为2（1，4）d。麻疹IgM和IgG抗体阳性率分别为76.06%（216例）和88.38%（251例）。ROC曲线分析显示，麻疹IgM、IgG和IgM/IgG评价方法的AUC分别为0.753、0.891和0.952，采用麻疹IgM/IgG值判定PVF和SVF效果较好；麻疹IgM/IgG评价方法的最佳临界值为0.06，灵敏度88.75%，特异度86.63%。当麻疹IgM/IgG值>1时，96.30%（26例）的病例检测为低亲和力（RAI<40%），只有1例为可疑（RAI：40%~60%）；当麻疹IgM/IgG值<0.01时，97.14%（102例）的病例为高亲和力（RAI>60%），只有3例为可疑（RAI：40%~60%）。以麻疹IgM/IgG值的临界值对2016年天津市中学麻疹暴发进行验证，急性期标本100%（26例）麻疹IgM/IgG值<0.06，84.62%（22例）麻疹IgM/IgG值<0.01。 结论： 利用ELISA方法检测麻疹IgM和IgG抗体后，采用麻疹IgM/IgG值判定PVF和SVF具有良好的诊断价值。.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]