These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Influences of gender, hand dominance, and anthropometric characteristics on different types of pinch strength: A partial least squares (PLS) approach.
    Author: Maleki-Ghahfarokhi A, Dianat I, Feizi H, Asghari-Jafarabadi M.
    Journal: Appl Ergon; 2019 Sep; 79():9-16. PubMed ID: 31109465.
    Abstract:
    The relationships of demographic and anthropometric characteristics (17 dimensions related to the hand, wrist, and arm) with four different pinch strengths (lateral pinch, key pinch, three-jaw chuck pinch and tip-to-tip pinch strengths) were evaluated among 196 (96 males and 100 females) young adults aged 19-30 years. For both dominant and non-dominant hands, the lateral pinch was greatest, followed by the key pinch, three-jaw chuck pinch and tip-to-tip pinch strengths. Mean pinch strengths of the dominant and non-dominant hands of females varied between 62%-78% and 61%-73% of those exerted by males, respectively. Strength of the dominant hand was 5.3%-7.5% stronger than of that of the non-dominant hand, with this difference being generally higher in females than in males. Hand length and forearm length showed the strongest correlation with all types of pinch strengths exerted by both the dominant and non-dominant hands. In the partial least squares analysis, 10 out of 17 anthropometric indices including hand length, forearm length, arm length, middle finger width, thumb length, index finger width, thumb width, wrist depth, palm depth and index finger depth had considerable loadings in the extracted component, explaining 37% of the total variance. These findings can fill the gap in the strength data, or used by health professionals and designers in the field.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]