These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibody-related and idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia.
    Author: Shioya S, Masuda T, Yamaguchi K, Sakamoto S, Horimasu Y, Nakashima T, Miyamoto S, Senoo T, Iwamoto H, Ohshimo S, Fujitaka K, Hamada H, Hattori N.
    Journal: Respir Med; 2019 Jun; 152():44-50. PubMed ID: 31128609.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibodies frequently experience complications of interstitial pneumonia (ARS-IP), and the computed tomography (CT) of ARS-IP frequently shows nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern. The CT pattern of ARS-IP might be different from that of idiopathic IP. However, the clinical differences in patients with ARS-IP and idiopathic IP showing the similar CT patterns have not yet been well studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical differences between patients with ARS-NSIP and idiopathic NSIP (I-NSIP). METHODS: Two groups of 34 patients each, with ARS-NSIP and I-NSIP, who visited Hiroshima University Hospital between January 2005 and December 2017, were enrolled. Clinical features and outcomes were retrospectively compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The ARS-NSIP group included more female patients and significantly younger patients than the I-NSIP group. The percentage of lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was significantly higher, and the CD4/CD8 ratio in BALF was significantly lower in the ARS-NSIP group compared with the I-NSIP group. The proportion of patients with traction bronchiectasis detected by CT was significantly higher in I-NSIP compared with ARS-NSIP. The number of patients who received corticosteroid and/or immunosuppressant therapy was significantly larger in the ARS-NSIP group than in the I-NSIP group. In addition, the patients in the I-NSIP group who underwent the immunosuppressive therapy demonstrated shorter survival than those who underwent no treatment; this tendency was not observed in the ARS-NSIP group. The 10-year survival rate of patients in the ARS-NSIP group was significantly higher than that of patients in the I-NSIP group (91.8% vs. 43.0%; log-rank, p = 0.012). The multivariate survival analysis revealed that positive anti-ARS antibody was an independent favorable prognostic factor in the patients with NSIP (OR, [95% CI]:0.12 [0.02-0.55], p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ARS-NSIP had a significantly better prognosis than those with I-NSIP; this may be associated with the sensitivity to immunosuppressive therapies, and the different findings of BALF and HRCT between the two groups.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]