These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Oral administration of erythrocyte membrane antigen does not suppress anti-Rh(D) antibody responses in humans. Author: Barnes RM, Duguid JK, Roberts FM, Risk JM, Johnson PM, Finn R, Hardy J, Napier JA, Clarke CA. Journal: Clin Exp Immunol; 1987 Jan; 67(1):220-6. PubMed ID: 3113783. Abstract: The effects of prior oral administration of erythrocyte membrane preparations (Oral Rh antigen) on the serum anti-Rh(D) antibody response has been evaluated in non-sensitized Rh(D)-negative male volunteers, and in female volunteers sensitized previously by Rh(D)-positive fetal blood during pregnancy. Sixty-one percent (11/18) of males who received oral Rh antigen (either D-positive or D-negative) before intravenous challenge with Rh(D)-positive cells produced detectable antibodies; of these 11, six received oral Rh(D)-negative antigen and five received oral Rh(D)-positive antigen. Seventy-two percent (13/18) of control males, who had received no prior oral Rh antigen, produced antibodies following challenge with Rh(D)-positive cells. Three out of six pre-sensitized females who received oral D-positive or D-negative Rh antigen for 4 weeks, but without intravenous challenge, increased their anti-Rh(D) antibody levels which peaked after 11-18 weeks: two had received Rh(D)-positive antigen, and one Rh(D)-negative antigen. These data indicate that administration of oral Rh antigen before parenteral immunization does not significantly suppress the anti-Rh(D) antibody response. Indeed, oral administration of either Rh(D)-positive or Rh(D)-negative antigen can boost systemic antibody in pre-sensitized females. These results do not support the rationale of treating Rh-sensitized pregnant women with oral Rh antigen.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]